What A True Feminist Society Would Look Like
Straight out of Wikipedia, feminism as we know it is…
“a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending a state of equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights of women. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women.”
“Feminism is mainly focused on women’s issues, but author Bell Hooks and others have argued that, since feminism seeks gender equality, it must necessarily include men’s liberation because men are also harmed by sexism and gender roles in society.”
Well alright then gentlemen, let’s envision a truly gender-equal society where the law makes no discrimination between men and women. Maybe it won’t be so bad after all!
Female Gladiators Fighting To The Death
This first example is very antiquated, but female gladiators are proven to have existed during the days of the Roman Empire. However, they were likely very few in number and would have almost certainly been considered a spectator novelty. In all likelihood, they were probably infected with narcissistic personality disorder (like a substantial percentage of western women in the age of social media), and unlike the men, they were nearly all volunteers.
Thankfully, the largely gender separate (anti-feminist) mentality of Roman culture thoroughly protected women from this violent form of entertainment. Roman men preferred that they remain at home to take care of children, prepare food, and continue to be loving wives and mothers which would help ensure the well-being of the future generation.
Anyways, the following video clip from the 2000 film “Gladiator” shows a brief mash-up of several female gladiators being dispatched during the movies first major scene inside the Roman Coliseum. The all-male “barbarian horde”, led by our masculine hero Russell Crowe, are exercising their natural rights to self-defense and preservation of life by beheading or ripping apart these female attackers who are trying to kill them.
Through their superior training, discipline, and all-male cooperation and cohesion, they ultimately emerge victorious over their “coeducational” opponents. (Their adversaries were presumed to be the victors due to their larger numbers and immediate access to more diverse weaponry, which included scythed chariots).
Raise your swords boys! For feminism! For “equal opportunity” (to die horribly)! Yeaaahhhhh!
Equal Pay For Male Porn Stars
The financial compensation for male porn stars, in comparison with their female counterparts, is without doubt one of the biggest travesties of the gender pay gap and makes a complete mockery of the mantra “equal pay for equal work”. Yet no feminist advocacy group will ever champion better pay rates for male pornographic actors or point out this blatant hypocrisy.
Feminists (and clueless women in general) continue to regurgitate the continually disproved nonsense of earning “77 cents to the dollar” against their male counterparts across all fields of work. However, the famous porn star Ron Jeremy has made comments on the pay scale differential of women and men in the sex film industry.
In 2003 “Girls can easily make 100-250k per year, plus stuff on the side like strip shows and appearances. The average male makes $40,000 a year.” In 2008, “The average guy gets $300 to $400 a scene, or $100 to $200 if he’s new. A woman makes $100,000 to $250,000 at the end of the year.”
Now obviously, things have changed quite a bit in the last decade. The proliferation of torrent websites have been seriously (no pun intended) eating into the bottom line of the pornographic film business, and pay rates are down substantially across both genders. However, if women were earning a minimum of $100k annually and men were getting an average of $40k annually, then men were getting less than 40 cents on the dollar compared to their female co-stars. Oh the outrage!!
A true feminist (equal opportunity) society would find such blatant workplace discrimination against male porn stars to be utterly inexcusable. They would either vastly increase the financial compensation of the male actors or significantly reduce the compensation of the female performers. Because if modern trends in pornography actually consider women like Bonnie Rotten (a total freak show with a hideous array of tattoos) to be sexually desirable, then any male porn star who has been assigned to copulate with this woman deserves to be very well compensated. At least as much as what she’s earning.
Husbands Making Out Like Bandits In Divorce
A true feminist (equal opportunity) society would grant men 50% of their wealthier wives’ financial assets in the event of a no-fault divorce. In other words, if the husband is growing bored and “unhaaaappy” because his wife isn’t being an entertaining clown 24/7, he can divorce her and be guaranteed half of the fruits from her years of hard work. Not to mention the potentially generations worth of accumulated inheritance from her side of the family.
Additionally, he would always be guaranteed joint-custody and full visitation rights for his children, along with receiving alimony payments from his ex-wife if that’s applicable (or desirable). Let the good times roll gentlemen!
Lots Of Female Coal Miners
Sure, female coal miners do exist, but it’s nowhere close to the 50/50 ratio that a true feminist society would find desirable. Such a society would work tirelessly to make sure as many females as possible were working in coal mines. It would “empower” them by earning above-average wages, which would also help narrow the gap on that pesky “77 cents on the dollar” income discrepancy between males and females.
Because remember, in our current male-dominated underground coal mining sector, working your royal ass off in a quasi-hellish environment and dying well before the age of 50 by Pneumoconiosis (Black Lung), is all part of “male privilege“.
Elimination Of “Ladies Night”
A truly feminist society would recognize the blatant anti-male discrimination of “ladies night” at alcohol vending establishments, and would promptly abolish this barbaric ritual. Women entering bars and nightclubs for free and getting discounted drinks just because they were born with a Vajayjay? We’re not going to have any of it (anymore).
Not to worry, women these days are “strong and independent”, and I’m sure with the fantastic economy they will have no problems adjusting to not receiving free drinks anymore. That’s in addition to opening up their wallets and paying full-price to enter nightclubs and discos.
Finally, nightclubs and bars would adopt zero-tolerance policies for aggressive or anti-social behavior coming from females which would have previously set a low benchmark only for male patrons. Therefore, women throwing their beverage in a man’s face over a trivial argument or minor misunderstanding should be prepared to be ejected from the establishment. Head First.
Women who do something like this unprovoked…
Should be prepared to be ejected like this…
Celebration Of Men’s History Month
In case you didn’t know it already, “Women’s History Month” is an annual declared month that highlights the contributions of women to events in history and contemporary society. It is recognized during the month of March in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia where it also corresponds with “International Women’s Day” on March 8th. In Canada, it’s recognized during the month of October.
Sigh…. leave it to the four most prominent members of the Anglosphere to shove their feminist agendas right down our throats. However, a true feminist society would recognize “Men’s History Men” and highlight all the contributions of men throughout history. This of course would amount to just about everything, especially regarding technological, scientific, and cultural progress.
Ultimately, the “Women’s History Month” supporters would feel so embarrassed by their lack of contributions, that the best compromise would be to just drop the gender-specific history month celebrations entirely. Fair enough.
(Aviation pioneers Charles Lindbergh and Amelia Earhart)
It’s highly doubtful that the “feminists” as we know them today are looking forward to the feminist society which prominently features the hypothetical scenarios in this article. Yet it’s actually feminism in it’s most pure manifestation. Equal rights, equal opportunity, equal compensation, equal legal representation, equal sharing, and most importantly, equal responsibility.
The feminists of 2014 do not want the shared responsibility. In other words, their version of feminism does not make any sense.